Currency Strength Meter for Larger 1920 x 1080 Monitors
Currency Strength Meter for Larger Dual 1920 x 1080 Monitors
Currency Strength Meter for Larger 2560 x 1440 Monitors
Currency Strength Meter for Larger Dual 2560 x 1440 Monitors
Currency Strength Meter for Larger 4K Ultra HD Monitors
GO BACK [ ::.::.. ] VIEW START PAGE
Currency Strength Index Chart represents the rate of change price movement for the eight major currencies measured against other majors. App displays rate of change strengthening and weakening in relation to the other(s) as chosen by the user.
Many traders applying momentum based strategies prefer matching currencies that are ‘Strengthening’ and ‘Weakening’ rather than ‘Strong’ and ‘Weak’.
Percentage change of individual Forex pairs is calculated and then subsequently grouped with like kind. The rate of changes are then aggregated to produce a percentage change for each of the eight groups. These eight rate of change aggregations are then plotted on the chart together which allows both quick comparisons and in depth analysis to be made of the underlying currencies.
This page and entry level application here is intended only as an introduction into the measurement and analysis of currency strengths.
It is intended as a very quick, no hassle way of seeing what is happening in the total Forex majors market. For instance at London open or New York open or New York equity open at the bottom of the second hour. Or very often for returning users over the years, upon a high impact economic release like NFP to obtain a general idea of flows.
So, the strength chart above is intended to provide a general idea of general flows or drastic sentiment changes. (discussed further below under the slope section)
But mainly, it is intended more for end of day and weekend reflection and research.
This application is really not intended to be analyzed on a minute-by-minute basis for short term decision making. As noted if this is in fact your intention, please obtain actual professional tools that use streaming data. That is of course, if you do plan on making a career of this trading thing.
The simplistic percentage rate of change method for analyzing strength of individual pairs is different than the standard currency strength formula precursor that is used within our new 5NITRO+ Metatrader 4 meters.
While this percentage change formula used here might be considered inferior to the formula used within 5N+ that was originally created by Thomas Yeomans out of Nova Scotia during the mid 2000s, it suffices for general analysis purposes here.
View more info detailing the standard CSM formula and its precursor integration into all versions of the NITRO+ meters
We get it. You are in an introductory research phase. You are unsure whether or not utilizing ‘currency strengths’ within your trading may or may not be viable. Until a tool or method is deemed viable or at least possibly viable, it makes more sense to keep scanning the internet trying out free iterations.
But, it is assumed researching traders that do find this type of tool and its type of analysis useful would then surely seek to graduate into a more robust, full featured application. As such, when an apprentice carpenter finally concludes that a hammer or saw are in fact both highly useful in the carpentry profession and always will be, he or she finally commits to purchasing their very own tools for the toolbox. This long term investment decision is made rather than continuing to borrow others’ tools on a daily basis for the next forty some odd years. Or as opposed to another questionable, odd insistence that all tools should always be free?
Tom Yeomans’ flagship offering named Accustrength is currently the best available. Sure, there are recompiles of the old XMeter found on the scam MT4 App Marketplace from the scam sellers there. But even Yeomans’ entry level ForexSnap (web based) or legacy versions FX4Caster and Forex Grail all far surpass the strength chart app on this page or indicators available anywhere in terms of daily usability for the career trader.
Simplify + Organize
Chances are overwhelmingly against you being able to lock down that elusive, perfect, fantasy, ‘intraday scalping system’ using any strength meter version (or any indicator in the world for that matter) which can then be used to infinitely-repeat your way into The Forbes Billionaire List
But, knowing exactly what is happening in the entire FX Market with just a quick glance should provide infinite realistic dividends
The value of this total market simplification is difficult to initially measure or project, but it seems obtaining tools that do so might be a second logical investment when beginning a trading career. The first logical investment, it would seem, is a proper machine or machines offering adequate display options with lotsa workspace for all supplemental correlated information.
Currency strength indicators along with the newly created 5NITRO+ Heatmap configurations along with incredibly inexpensive multi-monitor setups along with amazingly inexpensive bulk RAM along with multi-core CPU machines all add up to a full market picture.
These basic tools combined introduce the ability to now trade and manage many more FX Pairs, BitCoins, CFDs, Commodities, Indices, Futures, Bonds, Bunds, and Traditional Forex Options.
The diversification, variance, and risk reduction these tools allow for should truly provide infinite realistic dividends throughout an entire career.
Take Some Profit
Strength chart also can provide trend length perspective and overbought / oversold relativity.
OBOS on lower time frames is often generally too risky as opposite trend entry points, or rather stop and reverse triggers. OBOS on lower time frames is generally best at serving as areas to begin thinking about taking some profit in a percentage of units.
These trend length relative overextensions and OBOS areas on higher time frames serve as possible indications for mean reversion strategies or to hedge risks.
In depth observations of mean reversion on the Weekly time frame is provided further below in the last section.
Can Neither Be Created Nor Destroyed
Strength and Weakness can only … Transform
The strength index chart in turn gives us money flow into or out of one major currency in relation to the seven others. There is an overwhelmingly high inverse correlation that takes place. This correlation is an absolute 100% in the above strength chart because the formula is comprised 100% of the twenty-eight major currency pairs. The same applies to most all other CSMs.
But as we know, the world and Forex market is comprised of more than just these eight major regions and currencies of course. This formula and most other CSM formulas are not including such pairs as EURHKD, USDRUB, USDCNY, or GBPSGD as examples. Therefore, this perfect inverse correlation and zero sum property does not apply in reality outside of these applications. But in large part as measured in total yearly FX volume, proceeds received from selling a particular major eight currency is immediately used to purchase any combination of other seven major currencies …. simultaneously.
Because of ‘Zero Sum’ theoretical logic, this type of analysis capability provided by the currency strength meter is unique to the Forex market. An example to the contrary: When money flows out of a particular equity stock as an example, this does not necessarily mean those same funds will immediately be used to purchase additional, separately-measured equity …. simultaneously.
While most Leader / Follower research over the years has been devoted to Forex Pairs, the addition of a currency strength chart can significantly improve strategies based on these theories.
For more in depth information and analysis dedicated to Leader / Follower, seek out the research of Forex Automaton.
Leader / Follower is highly dependent on time frames or the period of time in which pairs are measured, similar to the variability of correlations.
Forex Automaton also expands on the new ‘Currency Exchange Rate Correlation Strength Index’. CERCSI is a completely new measurement providing Zero-Lag correlation strength.
Lower Time Frame Momentum Ideas
Slope and Space
It seems that for the average Momentum or Swing Trader, the angle or slope in combination with available room to move might present the lowest risk, more ideal opportunities over an extended period of time and large enough sample size. Meaning, not any given single trade. But instead, let’s say over the course of one year and 200+ opportunity events.
An extreme, preferably extended sharp angle seems to indicate the introduction of Real Money Flow at and from that point. A GANN GRID supplied in all MT4 Platforms is commonly used for angle measurement and relativity on Metatrader 4 currency strength indicators like our old FlowMeter.
Historically, continuation is high probability when these sharp slopes appear. This probability increases as the time frame increases assuming apples to apples comparisons with the angle and length of initial sharp slope being equal in relative terms.
Because of this higher historical probability, scheduling a portion of intended entries using limit orders on what is often times an inevitable ~23.6% to ~61.8% retracement can often help to reduce entry risk for the initial position portion while ‘chasin pips’ into the strong flow.
Or, using theses common retracements to re-enter by replacing some units that may have had their take profits quickly taken out.
Slope Angles … mean something
Sharp angles spiking from extended consolidation will often mean something even greater.
The slope angle percentage outweighs a lack of follow through space on strength charts like this. Sharp slope is actually representative of something – Real Money Flow. Which means, it actually means something to most global professionals.
Crossing Currency Lines … mean nothing
CSM vendors and elite members in FX discussion forums seem to all inevitably gravitate towards giving the advice for users to “Take Action When Currency Lines Cross”.
These crossing lines, regardless of actual degree angles they form, are being promoted as some sort of magical phenomena.
Many CSM software sellers and FX Forum Elite Members recommend using these crossing-line prompts as a main or only strategy. Presumably intended to be repeated indefinitely using the same crossing cues each day. What?
What in the world does lines crossing on an obscure CSM Indicator of which uses a uniquely-proprietary strength algorithm with formula settings that can be modified and tweeked by each user…. even indicate? Nothing. It is a chance happening representative of nothing, in general terms.
Sure, it could sometimes represent massive money flow and opportunities in one or both underlyings. But if massive incoming or outgoing flow is the entry parameter, then make this the parameter. How? By measuring angles, not crosses. Crosses that will also include by default many ‘subtle crosses’.
Then why do so many vendors and so much marketing across the Internet advertise intraday buy sell signals solely upon some simple graphical output occurrence of some proprietary tool or proprietary modification? Like, for example, crossing of squiggly currency strength lines anywhere within its window at any slope?
Because, exactly like us, these vendors probably receive emails by the hundreds from customers and potential buyers endlessly seeking an easy binary solution. As if this actually exists or is actually possible … long term.
New Retail traders believe a short term, intraday, technical, repeatable, binary method exists because vendors across the Internet all advertise and have always advertised that it does exist. Nearly all of them. Nearly every commercial site or commercial listing we have all stumbled upon over the years advertise some form of a simple green light, red light system.
Every one of these magical commercial Indicators or EAs is able to exploit some secret, overlooked technical glitch in any market to produce a binary signal of buy or sell at any time during the day. During any session. In any pair. Regardless of any fundamentals.
Presumably for decades, whichever particular advertised technical trigger has flown completely under all institutions’ radars (such as Goldman or Virtu). Not even the institutions’ $20,000,000,000.00+ worth of combined yearly IT expenditures and manpower on whole globally … have been able to harness let alone even spot this simple infinitely-repeatable wealth generator. Available to all of us for $97.
Adding to it, these thousands of unique applications are nearly all different with their modes of action. But yet, somehow magically each exploiting its own unique discovery of a market glitch to produce windfall profits for all who install.
Customers demand these exact binary short term signals. So as a means to sell more software by pleasing everyone and appearing simple to use, vendors create these bogus ‘crossing line’ type signals out of thin air. Sales marketing with colored buy / sell arrows appear to make sense to the potential buyer when viewing the splash page. And most importantly, appear simple to apply.
Regardless of whether or not any web surfers actually purchase or succeed with any of these tools and their marketing trickery of screenshot illusions, the experience has served to further the fantasy propaganda into new, researching Retailers’ minds. Our brains subconsciously-aggregate all of this scam marketing to equal factual reality. Or at least to equal a reality of ‘possible’.
My brain concludes from its total web surfing composite that “It must be possible to obtain a Yellow Ferrari using only signal outputs of technical indicators because I have seen endless data points of exactly this with my own eyes, everywhere I have looked on the Internet over many years!”
► So then, tell me exactly when to Buy. Tell me exactly when to Sell. I want to outsource my decisions. I want to outsource my thinking altogether.
We should not underestimate the power and reliability of the ‘Self-Fulfilling Factor’ within our own internal decision making algorithm. When we try to use technical trigger points from proprietary tools with black box formulas and settings, we are completely removing arguably the most important equation factor. Such as when trying to rely on technical points that are very specific to a specific tool like ‘Crossing Lines’.
Some will no doubt debate this with “Well what about 5NITRO+ / 6NITRO+? They are obviously proprietary and somewhat black box.”
Sure, but 5N+/6N+ are generally outputting a ‘Momentum Aggregate’, intended to confirm + present current Inertia opportunities.
Inertia is the greatest self-fulfiller of them all …. going back 2200 years.
Subtle crossing of currency lines or Stochastics …. are not.
Higher Time Frame Ideas
When analyzing the higher time frame standard charts of professionals, it’s really about trying to recognize and parallel REAL MONEY positions. And like noted in The 5NITRO+ Trading Pages, it’s about trying to recognize and decipher what the Institutions’ algorithms and fundamental research are indicating to them.
Look at the Chart
Increasing our risk threshold per pair and increasing our take profit goals will help allow trading more in sync with the institutions. We now have ‘friends in the business’. How do we know they even want us as friends? Well they are letting us follow them around everywhere they go just a few steps behind. They are even leaving a breadcrumb trail just for us. So then to keep up we need the same longer term outlooks and take profit ranges. We reduce effective per position leverage by trading from a larger pool. Per decision risk is reduced by increasing number of entry and exit units per position.
Jumping onboard using the same daily charts with same key levels and same key moving averages allows for clarity of charts and clarity of objective. All the noise and meaningless technicals from all of the shorter time frames just fall away. What we are usually left with then are obvious, sustained megatrends most everywhere we look. Now we can make decisions based on the obvious patterns and clear trends we see directly on the chart.
When we finally decide to just go with the flow and go with global herd, we can then finally stop obsessing over trying to select the perfect combination of time frames and fibonacci and bollinger bands and donchian channels and elliot wave theories and moving average crosses and secret modified templates downloaded from ForexFactory.com.
We can stop endlessly obsessing over creating the perfect short term repeatable technical system to beat the market once and for all. Stop endlessly searching the internet for that perfect system that can exponentially compound our $50,000 into $50,000,000 in just over 2.3 years using the conservative estimate of “Only 20 pips per Day @ 500:1 Leverage”. A mantra whose popularity renews each new day with each new retailer that begins their FX career after discovering the phenomena of leverage combined with ‘daily session compounding’ using the Windows Calculator.
Instead, we can just learn to make high probable and logical decisions based on what we see the Institutions doing directly and clearly on our charts.
Likewise, we can instead redirect our ‘perfect system’ obsession into the best methods for managing and clearing all those take profits.
Luck is Not On Your Side
So why is it then that ~80% of all new Retailers reverse-engineer the construction of an infant trading career around these unreliable, random, coin-flip time frames of M1, M5, M15?
Why do ~60% of all potential users of our 5NITRO+ Meter ask about Scalping or 60 Second Binary Options?
Luck is On My Side
Maybe we all inherently believe that luck will be on our side, by default? Maybe then this could be a reason why there are 7+ billion people on this planet? Maybe this unwavering optimism and hope has been bred into our DNA. Or rather ‘selected for’ via natural selection over 4+ billion years?
Despite astronomical odds, we are all lucky enough to be alive right here, right now, at this exact moment in history?
Well then surely this incredible generational luck will carry over into something as simple as capturing 10 pips in the EURUSD a few times each day.
Yeah Surely. Cuzz I mean why would this long sustained trend of uncanny luck my ancestors and I have enjoyed through millennia … stop right now, all of the sudden?top
Weekly Mean Reversion Ideas
Zero Sum + Balance Points
FX, above all other markets, is reliably susceptible to daily, weekly, and monthly mean reversion of both buy side and sell side due to zero sum theoretical logic with week and monthly presenting lowest risk.
Well actually, while week and monthly offer the lowest risk as it is defined here because we are specifically discussing the above strength chart that includes a fixed width property, this is not necessarily true of time frames in general.
Extreme Support and Resistance
It is not the action of increasing time frames that reduces risk linearly. Risk is reduced when we are taking action in and around EXTREME support or resistance areas. Accordingly then, the support and resistance levels with the longest lookbacks offer the lowest risk.
So, if the chart or your view of the chart has a fixed width, like in the above index chart, you are more likely to see the highest resistance and lowest support if the time frame is higher and the zoom is the least. Hence, higher time frames present us with the lowest risk opportunities.
Enable all currencies on the weekly for proper perspective
Since I do not personally intend on holding positions for 7 years to 20 years, let us consider the weekly time frame as the highest rather than the monthly. weekly is also the highest option for the strength meter on this page. Also with many brokers providing MT4, their monthly data tends to be severely lacking. We are lucky if we can get 150 bars, even in USDJPY.
Amount of weekly history available usually gets us back to at least 1995. But, while your weekly charts beginning some time in the 1990s should be sufficient in establishing highs and lows, I still have access to a library of max charts from our traditional brokerage ETrade. There are plenty of free resources like Google or Yahoo Finance and CME. This is definitely suggested before ever building mean reversion positions from what appear to be absolute highs or lows.
While this strength chart is a good introduction tool into mean reversion methods and a nice, quick reference to get a general idea of possible opportunities in the underlying currency as a whole, it is obviously recommended to study actual individual pair charts before making any decisions.
Somewhat because of what was just noted. But primarily, because once we start analysing extreme support and resistance levels like this that may be 3 year, 5 year, 7 year, 10 year, or even 15 year highs and lows – they actually tend to hold up fairly well regardless of the actual pair.
Meaning, minor pairs such as GBPZAR tend to comply with multi-year support and resistance levels as well (or good) as GBPUSD, GBPJPY, EURUSD, EURJPY, AUDUSD, USDJPY, for example.
But on lesser lookback highs and lows such as one month or even one year, I am often cautious and leery about relying on and creating huge blocks of limit orders at these support and resistance levels to build a position from. Now, adding to an in-the-money, multi year position on a retracement to these levels? Sure. Taking some profit at these levels? Of course.
Out of Thin Air
Inflation adds an additional variable. That is, the culmination of longer term inflation building up.
I never apply mean reversion techniques to SELLING commodities or equity based CFDs or anything else equity derived due to longer term inflation factoring.
The inflation variable is like an impurity that can never be filtered out or neutralised. When calculating the fair value increase or decrease of equity related over longer periods like decades, inflation destroys the zero sum equation that exists in the FX market
… and likewise directly disproves the theory of “can neither be created nor destroyed”
Though as this ~2.85% yearly inflation rate applies to LONG mean reversion techniques of equity derived and commodities, it does then provide an ongoing positive effect after position establishment. It is like having the wind at our back. Though at only about 3 kilometers per hour, it is more like a light breeze. Better than a vacuum though, pulling us in the wrong direction. But, it still creates issues when establishing Long positions and increases risk in and around these entry areas.
This varying inflation variable renders multi-year resistance levels unreliable. And so then when creating huge blocks of limit sell orders in and around and up to these levels with huge blocks of stop losses then just above, reliability is a necessity.
Likewise then, support levels need to be adjusted up when buying. Longer lookback levels need to be adjusted the most, recent not as much. There is much less potential for position establishment issues however when figuring and situating buy limits. Because I never actually move support levels up in an effort to account for inflation, it tends to mean that I will just not end up with as many units as preferred, rather than having an entire position stopped out immediately which would happen often if selling.
But then what does this also mean when establishing these Long positions? Risk is increased for the time period immediately following the lowest entries that ideally were the initial.
Because support levels are never actually moved up in an attempt to accommodate as noted, huge blocks of stop losses need to remain below these non-adjusted levels. This forces an increase in the total amount of susceptible loss. The exact inflation adjusted support level is unknown so therefore we are forced to use the lowest known level (ever) to calculate and set our ultimate stop losses.
Keep in mind, positions with the possibility of lasting ~ 0.5 to 4+ years are being referenced here, not traditional swing trades. Not swing trades lasting only a few days or few weeks or even a few months.
Though, the intended hold times do not really matter as it relates to the reliability of major support and resistance. It is about the reliability of multi decade levels that have not been inflation adjusted that are the limiting issue. Even if 0.25 to 3 month swing trading was being pondered, the resistance level being used to establish a short position may be a 20 year high, for example.
Also keep in mind, weekly mean reversion is not being suggested as a primary method for the large bulk of trade volume. On average since 2008 when I began to mean revert, total net profit (or net loss) has only comprised about 17% of overall yearly gains (or losses). It pushed 40% in earlier years as many equity based CFDs reverted from ridiculous lows, such as DOW 30 components American Express, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, General Electric, Procter & Gamble, Caterpillar, Microsoft, Cisco, Intel.
The actual number of opportunities within a ten year period can be slim. Although, this past decade presented above average number of opportunities in comparison to past decades and presumably future decades. Primarily because this past decade included that 2008-2009 Financial Crisis and its extended distancing from the Mean in nearly all markets.
Separate Strategy, Separate Account
As outlined in other parts of this site, a separate broker (or separate account) is used only for mean reversion. If an additional broker is not the solution, a spouse or corporation can be used to create an additional account within the same Broker and a separate MT4 instance on separate machine. This will help tremendously in keeping methods and your daily trading activities separate.
Additionally to organization and clarity, brokers all have different strengths and weaknesses. Certain subsets of brokers and broker types are more ideal for certain intraday styles of trading requiring a small number of pair offerings and razor thin spreads, for example. Others may have increased spreads but also increased offerings. Others may handle rollover uniquely, providing an advantage or disadvantage for swing trading.
Expanding the pool of instruments traded will greatly increase opportunities while reducing risk. All 225+ symbols offered by this particular broker (AvaTrade) in its market watch window are all being sifted through for possible upcoming opportunities. All of them.
This glut of broker offerings might actually be the key in ensuring long term viability of this mean reversion method. And possibly, what gives it viability in the first place. It would be foolish to even contemplate this type of strategy via a single broker with only 22-28 FX pair offerings. The lack of opportunities would inevitably force high risk decisions leading to Martingale account destruction.
Increased Spread Costs? Increased Carry Costs?
But what about high spreads in some of those Minors, Exotics, and EuroZone CFDs? Well, with potential actual and equivalent gains in the 500 to 8 000 pip range, spread costs are seldom dictating any decisions. Neither are carry costs.
Many instruments and thus lower capital used per will lower risk by allowing for much more patience. More patience to endure the often grueling wait until extreme levels are tested. Patience to then meticulously build positions at these extreme levels as consolidation forms bases. Or in addition, the confidence and increased risk threshold to have large pre built blocks of buy limits and sell limits patiently waiting there for when a quick spike down to or up to, and maybe not all the way to … is the only opportunity actually provided every 5 years or so.
Spreading this method across as many instruments and different markets as possible allows the core theory and probabilities to eventually play out in our favor. It gives the theory room to breathe and room to eventually reward our patience and longer term capital investment.
Fixed Width Not Ideal
One of the caveats of using a fixed width tool like this is that the past can change sometimes drastically. After the extended periods of time required in mean reversion researching, there is a different set of of parameters that recent rate of change is being compared to. This repainting of the past is discussed in that sub section above.
I think rather that is just the perfect example of why, while this fixed width strength chart is a good introduction and somewhat serves its purpose here of being able to show live real time Weekly levels and to gain a general perspective, using a non fixed width chart is obviously more ideal to make actual Weekly mean reversion decisions.
I believe one of Tom Yeoman’s CSM software versions, either Accustrength or FX4Caster, does have the ability to show a wide view of history amounting to what would be a Weekly or Monthly view? Maybe not, but I would think this is possible through the settings. I am currently using our old FlowMeter Currency Strength Meter for MT4 on a daily basis for Weekly, Daily, and H4 based position trading. Like noted above, the pair charts themselves are used as main reference and last step decision making.
Though because this standard CSM formula peaks out at (9) and bottoms out at (0), it seems there might be a false sense of security generated because of these virtual tops (9) and virtual bottoms (0)
This leads almost to an inevitable forced Martingale strategy being deployed more often than not as strength readings hover horizontally along the tops and bottoms for extended periods of time. Price continues to move against us. Then, price continues and continues and continues to move against us as these strength readings are pegged at (0) or (9)
This Martingale nightmare is why only ‘Weekly’ mean reversion is recommended in the first place using extreme highs and lows. This nightmare is why we also need the definitive guidance of actual price support and resistance levels, rather than the virtual guidance and virtual limits of nine (9) and zero (0) from an obscure tool that the majority of worldwide professional traders are not looking at.
Though like the ‘Self Fulfilling Inertia Effect’ discussed further above, everyone is staring at extreme support and resistance levels, including both institutional and retail. The entire market has plans in place to take action once approached. These extreme levels are always pre disseminated by nearly everyone. Everyone and their computers. Obscure CSMs do not lead to this same self fulfilling type of response from the markets. Nine (9) and zero (0) are only pre disseminated by a handful of people, mostly retail.
In other words, analysts do not come on CNBC or Bloomberg advising that viewers ….
“Be on the lookout this week for JPY hitting zero (0) on the AccuStrength Currency Strength Meter!”.
More details about FlowMeter and FLOW+ further below.
Aggregation and Relativity
This legacy CSM with smoothing mechanism is named FlowMeter. I and many customers dating back to around 2008-2009 are using it. FlowMeter is being re-coded and improved for the new MT4 600+ and released as FLOW+. It is being partially integrated into 7NITRO+ and made available 2016 or 2017 (well at least before 2020) (NITRO+ customers since 2010 will all receive the 45% to 55% Loyalty Discount Code)
While these types of meters using the standard CSM formula including Accustrength and FX4Caster can provide some insight for higher mean-reversion, they are best suited for distinguishing slopes or simply providing an aggregation of the twenty-eight (28) major pair charts for very quick market analysis, in my opinion.
► The informational benefits of a tool that aggregates twenty-eight (28) charts should not be overlooked.
► The informational benefits of a tool that provides relativity of these twenty-eight (28) charts should not be overlooked. [shown below]
Currency Strength Meters for MetaTrader 4 (MT4) and MetaTrader 5 (MT5)
FLOW+™ A new currency strength meter for the new Metatrader Builds 600+ named FLOW+ has to be recoded from the beginning. Coding the 3NITRO+, 4NITRO+, and then 5NITRO+ Upgrades was the priority once this new MT4 600+ had began to roll out in February 2014. I have been using one of our older graph-output CSMs on its own dedicated spare 18.5″ monitor utilizing the MT4 compatibility engine (I assume), so F+ is still not really a priority. Other than Weekly Mean Reversion opportunities which can easily be gathered from the CSM on this page, I personally utilize CSMs as more of a 28 chart aggregation tool. I need to get a general idea of the entire FX market in one spot with just a glance, so the older FlowMeter suffices. I know what is in the code, so I know the output is perfect. Perfect enough. But a new CSM will get done eventually. Just not right now.
Multiple display configurations and output types is the goal. Ease of use and RAM CPU friendly is a must. Constant position changing Dynamic Rankings to instantly identify strongest vs. weakest is a necessity.
These dynamic rankings are trying to be modeled after LeverageFX’s Currency Strength Rankings in block form …. the App with Green and Red blocks in which the colors are variably weighted dependent on rank. Sort of like a Heat Map that is constantly ranking itself from top to bottom. This is the Top Gun Software from LeverageFX.com for the eSignal trading platform.
For anyone who has used this Top Gun software on eSignal in particular that specific CSM template, then you know how useful these instant rankings can be. This information can be especially useful for short term, intraday traders continually seeking to match strongest versus weakest as soon the opportunity presents itself. Primarily, following fundamental events such as NFP or the London and New York opens each day.
Metatrader 4 coding logic, such as “A single indicator can only occupy one chart location, either the main chart, or a bottom indicator window” in addition to only one output type – increases the coding limitations. However, once the base meter is split into a series of indicators – the possibilities for display combinations is increased.
Though, this new Metatrader Plus+ is opening up many more new possibilities and presenting easier paths for current possibilities.
Will probably be a simple multiple time frame meter marketed initially as an add-on to the bottom or top of New 7NITRO+ or 8NITRO+ Meters … sort of like pictured to the left and to the right of the working alpha with the older NITRO+ Original
Bookmark this CSM Page
Check back 2017
Sizable Machine Resources Required
These tools are not like Stochastics or the ol’ MACD loaded on one single TF. These tools are complex and resource intensive.
It was roughly calculated that 5NITRO+ alone, utilizing one of its 28 pair multiple meter templates, might be performing up to 15,000+ calculations per second during such times as NFP on a multi-decimal Broker. This is assuming about 2 ticks per second on average over that entire 15 minutes following release. As we all know, the initial 1-3 minutes can produce as many as 3-5 ticks per second on pipette Brokers.
These are only the parameter calculations done by the 5N+ meter itself across the 28 pairs over the up to 7 total time frames*. This does not include the additional, whatever automatic internal calculations that are performed per each new tick by the 24 internally-aggregated Indicators themselves such as ADX, Alligator, Accelerator, Awesome Oscillator, etc, etc. These calculations are done automatically within your Metatrader Platform, but only when they are instructed to do so. Such as is what happens when 5N+ is loaded.
*Maximum time frames calculated by 5N+ is 7.0. Mean time frames calculated by 5N+ is about 4.7. Median time frames calculated is 5.0. Minimum time frames calculated is 3.0. The Minimum of 3.0 is when loaded on the Monthly periodicity. Number of time frames used for calculation is dependent on time frame in which the meter is loaded or time frames that the User has selected from the drop down list from within the settings. The influence that each other additional time frame has on the ultimate GLOBAL% is non-linearly variably-weighted. 5NITRO+ automatically adjusts MTF influence / weightings. There is now the option to either ‘quicken’ the response of the entire meter or to ‘smooth’ the response. This new feature is called ‘Time Outlook’. Strength Lookbacks can also now be adjusted which will also have an affect on the response.
Massive Calculations Per Tick
Full breakdown + explanation of the 5NITRO+ algorithm, including coefficient weightings of all additional, adjacent time frames used in the calculation formula – can be found here
Yes, there will be some calculation-per-tick redundancies when adding a CSM, making it similar to that 28 pair template used in the example above. But, we have to plan for Users wanting to run both at the same time, and possibly on a different set of pairs. A User may want to use the CSM to calculate Forex pairs, while using a multiple meter 5NITRO+ configuration on Minors, Exotics, CFDs, GOLD, SILVER, OIL, and Equity Indexes or Futures. In doing so, a multiple 5N+ setup could include 50-60 meters, depending on how many Minors, Exotics, and different CFDs are offered by the particular Broker. This then would push calculation-per-second into the about 25,000-30,000 range.
So then, “Per-Tick Performance” has become an obstacle. Features and number of calculations per tick will need to be eliminated or reduced to
allow for DLL calls (the new MT4+ Builds 600+ may have killed DLL calls to who Metaquotes considers “untrusted 3rd party sources”. which of course means everyone except metaquotes.net is untrusted). Not really sure what this means yet.
Commercial Tools cannot be created only for those with 24GB RAM, Xeons, and 2560×1600. We are forced to create for 32bit 2005-2006 1280×720 15.6″ Laptops runnin’ Windows XP sporting a max of 3.63GB usable RAM.
Because if you are trading Retail Forex in 2016 and do not reside in the United States, Japan, Canada, or North Western Europe … these are most likely your machine specs.
❤ Download 5NITRO+.zip 3.04 MB $199.99Forex MT4 Indicators and Currency Strength Meter Download Menu
Financing Options Including No Interest + NoPayments for 6 Months via PayPal Credit® Bill Me Later®
All Payment Options
View Download + Installation Instructions
How Does 5NITRO+ Work?
View Fifty-Five (55) Screen Shots of the Fifty-Five (55) Templates Included Free